This package is meant to be used with Weenie. However, if you are not using Weenie but are interested in this functionality, there's nothing wrong with using it directly.
WARNING: EXPERIMENTAL. Messaging is an area that will typically benefit from stronger opinions, so this library may end up being too opinionated for you or not opinionated enough. Feedback welcome at https://github.com/wymp/weenie/issues.
Here's how I thought about this:
A Hypothetical types.ts file, which you might keep in a shared library
/** All domains in our system */
export enum DOMAINS {
FOO = 'foo',
BAR = 'bar',
}
/** Actions that might be taken on a resource */
export enum ACTIONS {
CREATE = 'create',
UPDATE = 'update',
DELETE = 'delete',
};
/** Thing 1 */
export type Thing1 = {
id: string;
type: 'thing-one';
one: number;
two: boolean;
}
/** Thing 2 */
export type Thing2 = {
id: string;
type: 'thing-two';
name: string;
age: number;
}
/** Thing 3 */
export type Thing3 = {
id: string;
type: 'thing-three';
name: string;
lat: number;
long: number;
}
/** Groupings of all resources available per domain */
export type RESOURCES = {
[DOMAINS.FOO]:
| Thing1
| Thing2;
[DOMAINS.BAR]:
| Thing3;
}
/** An internal "standard message" type */
type StdMsg<Domain extends string, Action extends ACTIONS, Resource extends { id: string; type: string }> = {
key: `${Domain}.${Action}.${Resource['type']}`;
domain: Domain;
action: Action;
resource: Resource;
}
/** The type of all messages in the Foo domain */
export type FooMsgs = StdMsg<DOMAINS.FOO, ACTIONS, RESOURCES[DOMAINS.FOO]>;
/** The type of all messages in the Bar domain */
export type BarMsgs = StdMsg<DOMAINS.BAR, ACTIONS, RESOURCES[DOMAINS.BAR]>;
/** The type of all possible system messages */
export type AllMsgs =
| FooMsgs
| BarMsgs;
And here, your main.ts
file in the foo
domain service, where you instantiate your dependencies and run the app
import { Weenie, logger, retry } from '@wymp/weenie-framework';
import { amqp } from '@wymp/weenie-rabbitmq';
// You'll usually define this somewhere else using something like @wymp/config-simple, but for the example we're just
// doing it in-line
const config = {
app: {
name: 'my-service',
},
logger: {
level: 'error' as const,
},
retry: {},
amqp: {
cnx: {
hostname: 'rabbitmq',
port: 5671,
username: 'guest',
password: 'guest',
vhost: 'default',
},
publishing: {
persistentMessages: true,
exchange: {
name: 'my-org',
durable: true,
autoDelete: false,
}
}
}
};
// "Main" function - must be async so that we can await our AMQP dependency
(async () => {
// Instantiate all our dependencies
const deps = await Weenie({ config })
.and(logger)
.and(retry)
.and(amqp<AllMsgs, FooMsgs>('exponential'))
.done(async (d) => ({
config: d.config,
log: d.log,
retry: d.retry,
amqp: await d.amqp,
}));
// Later or somewhere else .....
// Add a subscriber to all messages from the Foo domain
deps.amqp.subscribe(
['foo.#'],
async (msg, attrs, log) => {
log.info(`Got message ${attrs.messageId} (${new Date(attrs.timestamp).toISOString()}): ${JSON.stringify(msg)}`);
return true;
},
{ queue: { name: deps.config.app.name } },
);
// Somewhere else ....
// Publish a create message for resource 'thing-one'
const msg = {
key: `foo.${ACTIONS.CREATE}.thing-one`,
domain: 'foo',
action: ACTIONS.UPDATE,
resource: {
id: '123',
type: 'thing-one',
one: 1,
two: true,
},
} as const;
await deps.amqp.publish(msg.key, msg);
})();
There are two things that I typically end up doing with an MQ.
First, generalized data events. I might use these to audit data changes in the system or to execute non-mission-critical
functionality based on observed system events (e.g., cleaning up certain files if a given resource is deleted). For
these events, I often end up creating a general message structure like the one demonstrated above (although I might
addtionally prefix the events with data.
so that my consumers can easily filter out those messages as a category).
Second, tasks. These should be thought of as mission-critical asynchronous jobs, and the events should be highly specific and well documented. Tasks are a first-class part of your API and should be treated as such.
It is a mistake to queue mission-critical tasks off of system "events". This is because events are non-specific from the emitter's perspective and may easily be eliminated or changed without thought and without noticing the downstream consequences. (What happens, for example, if an important email is never sent because the message that cued it was changed upstream? How long do you go before noticing that it's not sent, since there are no errors being thrown?)
Generated using TypeDoc